Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson)
Date: Sun Nov 4 07:03:05 2007
References: <000301c81ec6$9453b1d0$6401a8c0@asus930> <C3534798.7381C%mark@rabinergroup.com>

so back to the original question:  how's the linear distortion on the WATE?

leo


On 11/4/07, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>
> > Alastair, please send your lens to me and I promise to check if it
> matches the
> > description. Apparently only those with multi Leica
> > list citizenship were comfortable with the acronym.
> > I have to say that Mark taking us to task on the clarity of posts makes
> me
> > giggle a little into my Little Creatures ;-) Bless his
> > quirky, entertaining style.  Somehow we foreigners also manage to cope
> with
> > the preponderance of US-centric abbreviations and
> > cultural references without complaint. I thought that Leica acronyms and
> terms
> > might be thought of as common language within an
> > enthusiast Leica group.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Hoppy
> >
>
> Hoppy I for one would appreatate being takin to task for
> USCAACR
>
> US-centric abbreviations and cultural references
>
> And other abnormalities.
>
> Mark William Rabiner
> markrabiner.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Leo Wesson
Photographer/Videographer
817.733.9157

Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Reply from tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)