Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Sun Nov 4 15:32:45 2007
References: <20071104152012.94135E4@resin15.mta.everyone.net>

I think that's one of the impetus for me to get into XPan. I like the 
wide view (especially with the XPan panoramic) of the CV 15, but the 
images were just lacking for me.

At 03:20 PM 11/4/2007, afirkin@afirkin.com wrote:
>..
>I have both lenes as well, and would agree with all that Len says. 
>The 15 was for me a bit disappointing, but I know that for the price 
>it was a very handy lens to throw in the bag, but for all its size 
>and cost advantages, I put it on knowing the image would not have 
>the snap I'm now getting used to. The WATE so far (with the M8) has 
>been very good

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
please use richard at imagecraft.com) 


In reply to: Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin@afirkin.com) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)