Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Tue Nov 6 07:18:09 2007
References: <1520816.1194308777935.JavaMail.root@elwamui-little.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
 
I'll do some test images for you.
The DMR is due back today (from a two month stay at the Leica  
hospital in Jersey).
The full frame tests will take a little longer ;~) yet, I'll try and  
expose some film as well.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Nov 5, 2007, at 6:26 PM, Douglas Herr wrote:

> flare & distortion at least, full frame preferable.  I find it a  
> bit odd that a discussion of 14-15-16mm lenses includes such  
> diverse tools as those made by Cosina, Nikon, Canon and others but  
> no R
Replies: Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
 In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)