Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No M but progressive specs - gets some getting used to, but then you no longer want to do without them - you can drive AND watch the clock for instance. For photography, AF is a fine solution too.(I know some will hate this) Yours Phil...x Peter Klein wrote: > Up until recently, both my glasses and contacts prescriptions were > fine for focusing an M camera. When I got the M8, the smaller > magnification made focus a little more difficult, but still quite doable. > > My latest prescription has changed all that. I can still focus the M8 > fine in bright sunlight. But in standard room lighting and dimmer, I'm > having difficulty focusing at about 2 meters and closer. The > viewfinder image is slightly blurry--just enough to throw me off. The > issue is the same with both glasses and contacts. All this is after I > looked at my optometrist's eye chart through the M8 viewfinder with > various corrections, and he adjusted my prescription accordingly. > > My optometrist says my eyes are healthy, I'm just near-sighted and > middle-aged. :-) > > It seems like a single screw-in diopter correction for the M bodies is > not the answer, as the viewfinder itself seems fine for 2 meters and > farther, but I need something different as I get closer. A couple of > solutions come to mind: > > 1) Progressive lenses in my glasses > 2) An adjustable diopter correction for the M8 > > Progressive lenses might work. I guess you just hold the camera lower > on your glasses for focusing on nearby objects. Since I do computer > work, progressives might mean I could get by with only one pair of > glasses. > > Now, I tried progressives about 10 years ago. I used them for about a > month, but couldn't quite get used to them. I was perceiving varying > barrel distortion and other weird effects like the image "following > sligthtly behind" as I turned my head from side to side, and it drove > me nuts. I much preferred ordinary bifocals, so I ended up with them, > plus a additional single vision pair of glasses for computer work. > Maybe now that I've had the experience of adjusting to monovision > contacts, I might be more adaptable(?) > > The Megaperls magnifiers have an adjustable diopter correction. Their > 1.15x magnifier would bring the M8 image up from .68x to .78x, and I > could probably just leve it on the camera for lenses from 28mm to > 90mm. It would give me a diopter adjustment I could tweak between near > and far. This would work with contacts as well as glasses. > > So, calling all middle-aged dudes and dude-ettes with M cameras! How > have you coped with creeping presbyopia? Have you tried progressive > lenses, and how do they work for you, both with M cameras, and in real > life? Have you adjusted well to them? Do you get a stiff neck from > pitching your head up and down to "focus," or is it pretty natural > after a while? > > And does anyone have experience with the Megaperls magnifiers? How > usable are they with glasses, and is the diopter adjustment useful for > dealing with near vs. far focusing? > > Thanks, all! > --Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >