Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:18 PM 11/10/2007, Tina Manley wrote: >PESO: > >I've been experimenting with using a Beseler Slide Duplicator and >the Canon 5D instead of a Nikon LS5000 Slide Scanner for both B&W >and Kodachrome slides. I still prefer the scanner for other films >but for grainy, contrasty films that you can't use Digital ICE with, >the slide duplicator seems to do a better job. I know you can't >really tell anything from a web-sized photo (at least I can't!) but >here are the comparisons for one photo: > >Scanner: http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/88718456 > >Duplicator: http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/88746181 > >I can tell a big difference in the full-sized tiffs. They are both >sharper and less contrasty - which is something I haven't been able >to achieve with the scanned slides. But which one looks closer to the original? Kodachrome is notoriously difficult to scan. // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)