[Leica] Comparing Scanning vs Duplicating

[octabod at gmail.com (Luis Miguel Castañeda Navas)]

On 11/11/2007, at 20:04, Philippe Orlent wrote:

> Must be because the Coolscan's scanner is slow pass so more detailed.

I don't know, but in my screen (calibrated) there is an huge  
difference between the scanned and the duped, and the scan wins with  
the two hands tied to the back. Perhaps the dupe looks more like a KR  
on the light table, but not if it's projected as it should be, and,  
as is, in the webpic at least, is lacking far too much detail that  
scan the has.