Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]theoretically viable, but in practice a friend of mine was forced to sit in very close proximity in an office with a fellow given to such biking ambitions. i don't know if body odor is strictly a kind of pollution, but my friend was clearly a victim of an externality. -rei On Nov16 17:33, Philip Forrest wrote: > Exactly! > Get a bike, get healthy, save money, be MORE mobile and have access to > more > places than with an automobile. > I started commuting to work last may. When school started in late august, > I > began riding there as well. I've only paid a total of $8 towards public > transportation since May. Had I not been riding, I'd have spent $6 or $8 > per-day (the expense depends upon which campus I'm attending on a > particular > day.) $28 per-week. School has been in session for 13 weeks now, so I've > saved $364. I also lost 28lbs in weight. I get around town, to work, to > class, and home an average of 60% faster than taking public transportation > and easily half as much faster than privately owned vehicles. I think the > drivers of this city (Philadelphia) are very jealous of the cyclists > getting > around at normal speed while they are stuck in gridlock. Perhaps that's > why > so many drivers are so incredibly rude and very offensive towards cyclists. > Riding a bike will burn just a tad more fuel than you were previously > going to > eat, but it won't be burning the remnants of dead dinosaurs or peat bogs. > The world is so much better seen on a bike than in a car. It affords many > more photo opportunities as well. > > > PhilFo -- Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com Ridgewood, New Jersey