Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGS - Below the National Gallery - Corrected URL
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Sat Nov 24 18:14:57 2007
References: <200711160303.lAG32JPl096371@server1.waverley.reid.org> <4748D6C5.2040108@concentric.net>

Bob, I like the leaning mums in your original full frame. It makes a 
different picture of course. Just to be devil's advocate, I
think it is a better telling.
Cheers
Geoff fka hoppy

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMGS - Below the National Gallery - Corrected URL

Oops.

Here is the correct URL for the full frame image:

http://www.bobbaron.com/DC_Oct07/W_L1004200FullFrame.jpg

Geoff, thanks for your comments.  I have learned a tremendous amount 
over the years on the LUG and I always try to give something back in return.

Of course it would be easier if I would (a) type in the correct url of 
the example I am showing, and (b) proofread my emails before I send them.

;-)

--Bob

(Earlier this evening I wrote:

> You are right:  I was standing near the unfolding scene with a 28mm lens 
> on my M8.  I didn't feel comfortable barging over to get a close up.  It 
> would have destroyed the dynamic (and perhaps my reputation if the adult 
> got concerned and called for help).  Even wide open, with the 28mm I 
> could not throw the background adequately out of focus.  My back was 
> hurting and I didn't crouch down as I should have. I tried various crops 
> but there is too much distraction in the scene.
> 
> Here, btw, is the full frame before cropping:)


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from rbaron at concentric.net (Robert D. Baron) ([Leica] IMGS - Below the National Gallery - Corrected URL)