Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: Some advice please
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Nov 25 16:54:57 2007
References: <200711252346.lAPNhn9Q071989@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BAYC1-PASMTP15CFE2961D3DD8AC1FDB21C5750@CEZ.ICE>

On Nov 25, 2007, at 5:31 PM, J. Braun wrote:

> Vroger,
>
> Can your software convert a TIFF into a "raw" type file such as NEF,  
> DNG, etc.? If so, you should be able to manipulate the image to
> meet your needs.


I don't think so...

that's a bit like making a negative from a print...it's not going to  
happen, not with the results that you want...Steve
>
>
> J. Braun
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:11:50 -0500
> From: "Victor Rubin" <vroger@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Leica] Some advice please
> To: lug <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID:
>       <f2f825f20711251411w73b8fdbajb97a9da94577facb@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi All:
> Well, I've finally started shooting RAW and I love it. I did find,
> however, when I was shooting overseas with my FZ20 which has a 2.8
> constant aperture lens throughout the"superzoom" range, the 2.8
> aperture just wasn't enough. The camera does not have RAW,
> regrettably, and I find I cannot manipulate exposure the way I can in
> RAW. The camera does have TIFF,however, and I wonder if I could do any
> more with TIFF as regards underexposure than I can with JPEG. In other
> words, my impression is that TIFF was rather like JPEG when it comes
> to manipulation. Am I right or is there more leeway?- Bests vroger
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] RE: Some advice please)
In reply to: Message from jbraun at msn.com (J. Braun) ([Leica] RE: Some advice please)