Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I find TIFF to be a little easier to work on than JPEG, but it is only my feeling. BTW TIIF is what I used when I export from LRoom into PS. and it works fine then. Phil...x Gerry Walden wrote: >I am afraid that you are right and you are stuck with what you get. > >Gerry > >On 25/11/2007, Victor Rubin <vroger@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>Hi All: >>Well, I've finally started shooting RAW and I love it. I did find, >>however, when I was shooting overseas with my FZ20 which has a 2.8 >>constant aperture lens throughout the"superzoom" range, the 2.8 >>aperture just wasn't enough. The camera does not have RAW, >>regrettably, and I find I cannot manipulate exposure the way I can in >>RAW. The camera does have TIFF,however, and I wonder if I could do any >>more with TIFF as regards underexposure than I can with JPEG. In other >>words, my impression is that TIFF was rather like JPEG when it comes >>to manipulation. Am I right or is there more leeway?- Bests vroger >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> > > > >