Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>I was just stating that there's better price/quality around than this model. >Philippe I use an SD 800is. If I knew of another camera with its set of features, I might consider it. There is none I know of: Lens starts at 28mm equivalent Optical image stabilisation Optical viewfinder The 870 is similar, but to make room for the larger LCD, the optical viewfinder was sacrificed (a poor trade-off IMHO). The distortion can be fixed, if that's important to you, and it is to me at times. Low light capability is poor, but for subjects that hold still image stabilisation makes up for it. There are many compact models that have lenses that start at 35mm, but few at wider angles of view. And there are few with image stabilisation. If you want better high ISO performance, your only option is one of the Fuji models that offers the 'Super CCD'. All of them have lenses that start at 35mm equivalent. >Op 1-dec-07, om 16:11 heeft Frank Filippone het volgende geschreven: > >> Unfair..... it is 10% or less of the price of a film Leica, and like 5% >> the >> price of a M8. >> >> In fact, it is 1/3 the price of any USED Leica lens produced since the >> 70's. >> >> Don't expect to get gold from lead. >> >> Frank Filippone >> red735i@earthlink.net >> >> >> Hi Greg, >> If you're used to a Leica, 3 things might bother you: enormous lens >> distortion at the wide end, limited dynamic range sensor, and higher >> ISOs suck. >> I know, because I have one. >> Philippe >> -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com