Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAW: The tempest - Should I ?
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Mon Dec 3 13:47:03 2007
References: <4753EAC0.9040403@numericable.fr> <A62BC5A6-2FC0-41B5-9D21-46A67C613ED2@pandora.be>

Phillipes, I think the colour works. I love the subtle brown of the tree 
trunks against the stormy grey and movement. Says something
about the organics against the elements for me.
Cheers
Geoff 

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Philippe Orlent
Sent: Tuesday, 4 December 2007 05:11
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW: The tempest - Should I ?

Bonsoir Philippe
About the Turner questions: No. But I'd B&W it. And the signature is a bit 
bright.
But what a great shot.
Thanks for showing,
Philippe



Op 3-dec-07, om 12:38 heeft Philippe Amard het volgende geschreven:

> All,
> Should I crop out the clearer patch on the right hand side?
> http://tinyurl.com/24or8k
> This is the JPEG; the RAW file is still unprocessed.
>
> Comments, Criticism And Advice Are More than Ever Anticipated and 
> Aprreciated.
> Thanks in Anticipation
> Phil...x



Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] PAW: The tempest - Should I ?)
In reply to: Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] PAW: The tempest - Should I ?)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] PAW: The tempest - Should I ?)