Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Doug Her wrote: (in response to my statement - ) > >> I'm also debating this size business with 2 other snappers; we may be >> doing a 3 man show in a few months and one of these guys really feels >> that each one of us needs to commit to a single size for all of his >> images to foster more "unity of the individual's vision." > > Only if all the photos work at the single size. For a show you > don't want > any of the photos to look out of place, for example: > > ) one is huge, all the others are tiny. > ) one is B&W, all the others are color > ) one is square, all the others are panoramas > ) one is a landscape, the rest are musicians > ) one feels cramped at its printed size, the others don't > > There can be MANY reasons a photo can look out of place, conversely > they > don't all have to be uniform as long as there's a unifying theme among > them. I'd have included B&W photos in my book if I had more than > one I was > willing to use, likewise (much to my daughter's dismay) I don't > have enough > good photos of horses to have worked them into the theme of the book. > Doug - You've spelled out a very comprehensive yet concise way of viewing this issue, especially in the first sentence of your last paragraph. Bob Palmieri