Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I played with my son's new D300 and compared it to my D200. I was very impressed. I didn't compare absolute noise levels but resolution was better and noise performance was much better. What also impressed me was the image quality from his new 24-70 lens. I want one of those. Len On Dec 6, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Allen Graves wrote: > I just traded my D200 for a D300. ISO 3200 on it seems about as > good as ISO > 800 on the D200. I never found anything beyond ISO 800 useable on > the D200 > for anything more than 4x6. I'll try to put together a more formal > comparison (though the D200 is gone- ran into a guy who wanted it > more than > I wanted it).It certainly seems that for once Nikon has payed > attention to > what photographers want. > > Allen > > On Dec 6, 2007 9:50 AM, Leonard Taupier <len-1@comcast.net> wrote: > >> Thanks for the link, Ed. I find what's important for me is that ISO >> 1600 is as good as ISO 400 on the D2X. That would be as high as I >> normally go except on a very rare occasion. A friend of mine got a D3 >> loaner from Nikon on Monday. I'm anxious to see his photos. >> >> Len >> >> >> On Dec 6, 2007, at 6:21 AM, Eduardo Albesi wrote: >> >>> On the RFF someone posted this link to real world samples from the >>> new Nikon D3 at different ISO settings. >>> Quite impressive. >>> >>> http://coreymcnabb.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> ed albesi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information