Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not an even trade but he paid $1200 for the D200 (with vertical grip). I figured that it is the most that I would ever get for it, as I think that it would bring about $600 in another year. And once I had tried a D300 for available light I knew that it was inevitable that I would buy one. So I did it now. while I could still get something for the D200. Even though I don't usually like to be the first to buy a new model electronic product. Allen On Dec 6, 2007 6:58 PM, Christopher Williams <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > You found someone to trade your D200 for a D300? Do they want another > D200? What a deal :) > > I have 1600iso D200 16x20's, while noisy they do almost look like film > grain - almost. Many pre-D300/D3 noise complaints I've seen > are from underexposed images. My D2h is not great at high iso's but if the > image is exposed right it's very usable. The D300 1600iso > is something all together new for Nikon users. > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Allen Graves" Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: The D3 and ISO 25600 > > > >I just traded my D200 for a D300. ISO 3200 on it seems about as good as > ISO > > 800 on the D200. I never found anything beyond ISO 800 useable on the > D200 > > for anything more than 4x6. I'll try to put together a more formal > > comparison (though the D200 is gone- ran into a guy who wanted it more > than > > I wanted it).It certainly seems that for once Nikon has payed attention > to > > what photographers want. > > > > Allen > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >