Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Thanks to Kyle/Strobist
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed Dec 12 14:08:20 2007
References: <1197485415.47602d67c4064@panthermail.uwm.edu> <584A5682-B7F1-437D-879D-00380E457D1D@pandora.be> <476055DC.4090403@numericable.fr>

Aren't we all? There's always better, but as long as we learn from it...
Philippe


Op 12-dec-07, om 22:42 heeft Philippe Amard het volgende geschreven:

> objection Philippe:  the advantage of missing and learning from  
> errors - I'm an expert at the former, exclusively. :-(
> phx
>
> Philippe Orlent wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> For me the essence of the article was about the advantages of   
>> experimenting. Not about wether the example was cutting edge or not.
>> But I'm pretty sure only experimenting leads to cutting edge, or   
>> whatever you may call it.
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (amr3@uwm.edu) ([Leica] Thanks to Kyle/Strobist)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Thanks to Kyle/Strobist)
Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Thanks to Kyle/Strobist)