Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Saloon Keeper offers off-listly: > If you could convince her that it's safe for you to use your full name online, she'd be perfect. What a beauty. [ Thanks ] Actually, this brings me to a question. It seems to be fairly common for photogs to have websites with their names, e.g. tinamanley, kylecassidy, bdcolen etc. Not that I am in their territory, but I am tempted, especially that while a perfect name for such thing, www.imagecraft.com, belongs to us, but, um, we sell software on that site. So I need something more specific to my artstuff.... Unfortunately, www.richardman.com is taken, and as far as I can tell, it's not even owned by a person named Richard Man. I think he's a Richard Lee. Grr..... However, www.richardman.us is free. So what do the saloon patrons think? p.s. forgot to mention: that photo was 75/1.4 at F1.4. Fuji Acros. Contrast tweaked via photoshop. At 06:17 PM 12/24/2007, Richard wrote: >No, no, not wife number 3, but number 3 of the wife's pics, at least >in this series. > >So there was a good reason by the last two photos of my lovely wife, behold: > >http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/Scan-071224-0001+38.jpg > >Finally, may your Heart and Hearth be warm, may the Light of your >Spirit be Bright, and may the coming year bring you much joy! // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)