Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Fri Jan 4 14:33:09 2008
References: <C3A41B8C.13517%buzz.hausner@verizon.net>

Op 4-jan-08, om 23:21 heeft Buzz Hausner het volgende geschreven:
(snippet)
> I for one would be
> reluctant to use it as a paperweight because the edges of the lens  
> mount
> could etch fine paper.
>
> Buzz
>

Tr?s posh.
Philippe

>
> On 1/4/08 3:29 PM, "Michiel Fokkema" <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl>  
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all your reactions.
>> I can't imagine it is that bad.
>> I've read quit a few positive reactions on the net also.
>> Doug Herr for instance says it is a fine lens. Yes the tele elmar  
>> is better.
>> I was interested in the difference between version 1/2 and 3. I  
>> have a
>> version 2 R lens and am hoping the version M 1/2 will be close.
>> I now have bought a version 1 for a very low price and hope it will
>> serve its purpose. Otherwise it will make a fine paperweight:-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michiel Fokkema



Replies: Reply from buzz.hausner at verizon.net (Buzz Hausner) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)
In reply to: Message from buzz.hausner at verizon.net (Buzz Hausner) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)