Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Op 4-jan-08, om 23:21 heeft Buzz Hausner het volgende geschreven: (snippet) > I for one would be > reluctant to use it as a paperweight because the edges of the lens > mount > could etch fine paper. > > Buzz > Tr?s posh. Philippe > > On 1/4/08 3:29 PM, "Michiel Fokkema" <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> > wrote: > >> Thanks for all your reactions. >> I can't imagine it is that bad. >> I've read quit a few positive reactions on the net also. >> Doug Herr for instance says it is a fine lens. Yes the tele elmar >> is better. >> I was interested in the difference between version 1/2 and 3. I >> have a >> version 2 R lens and am hoping the version M 1/2 will be close. >> I now have bought a version 1 for a very low price and hope it will >> serve its purpose. Otherwise it will make a fine paperweight:-) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Michiel Fokkema