Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens
From: raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Sat Jan 5 08:01:53 2008
References: <25850488.1199539056584.JavaMail.root@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Since when do they use this designation?
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <wildlightphoto@earthlink.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens


> Raimo K <raimo.m.korhonen@uusikaupunki.fi> wrote:
>
>>APO means apochromatic correction of the lens, there are no apochromatic
>>elements.
>
> In Leica's case, APO is the designation they use for the extra-low 
> dispersion glass which their optical designers feel is essential to 
> designing lenses with apochromatic performance.  This is like Nikon's use 
> of the ED designation for their extra-low dispersion glass.  Raimo is 
> correct that there are no apochromatic elements, but there is APO glass 
> which is used to design apochromatic lenses.
>
>
>
> Doug Herr
> Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)