Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 6, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> > Depends on which dilution you use Bob! > If you use it straight or 1:1 your grain structure will be : > No > No grain structure. > Mush > Mush I tell you! > If you can make out the grain at all from the mush which surrounds > them. > At 1:2 you'll see fairly defined grain but with an edge which needs > work > At 1:3 you'll see nicely defined grain but you'll need good > magnification to > see it. A good loupe on an 11x14 print. That's a darkroom print. On an > inkjet those are not the subtleties involved. (in response to this business:) >> Before Brian and Steve posted their first comments I was gonna use >> this shot to illustrate my first experiences with New Tmax400 in >> Xtol. Very good sharpness (as advertised,) really long scale, >> endless highlight latitude (with a creamy, almost medium-format feel >> to them). Don't exactly know how the grain structure will look in a >> really big enlargement but there's a lot to like about this combo. >> However, I'm not sure yet about the spectral sensitivity. Whereas my >> fallback combo of Neopan 400 in Xtol usually looks like I actually >> knew enough to filter the shot properly (when I used no filter at >> all), the jury ain't in on this New Tmax stuff. >> snip >> Bob Palmieri Mark - Have you tried these dilutions with this allegedly New!New!New!!! Tmax 400? (My guy used 2:1 for this roll.) Bob Palmieri