Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica]The new T-Max 400
From: nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Thu Jan 10 22:17:23 2008
References: <30BB23E1-3745-4501-92DF-ED90843A2720@cox.net> <47852436.1030307@waltjohnson.com> <F43DE963-E72A-465F-92A7-8909C31A5285@cox.net> <47852C85.5080207@waltjohnson.com> <00e101c85317$306863c0$0200a8c0@robertbxucevjs> <8455dfa10801091702o4f1e2a14p9d98ce105909ff1@mail.gmail.com> <015c01c85329$a0c049a0$0200a8c0@robertbxucevjs> <aed41d690801091746r1402cc90w86e8db5d2cc1fd55@mail.gmail.com> <C2117952-9EA0-4BE7-ABC8-677F56CA6006@comcast.net>

Good news for me is that it appears to also be available in 220 (as  
is the current Tri-X). This turns my Bronica RF645 into an M on  
steroids, albeit with a slow lens.

Nathan

On 10-jan-2008, at 2:53, Leonard Taupier wrote:

> All the info on the improved film is here.
>
> <http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/bw/ 
> tMax400.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.17.14&lc=en>
>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yun427
>
> Len
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>
>> I hope its latitude is more forgiving.
>>
>> On Jan 9, 2008 7:39 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier@usjet.net> wrote:
>>
>>> No, it is not C-41.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "parker haeg" <leica68@gmail.com>
>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:07 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica]The new T-Max 400
>>>
>>>
>>>> The editor makes note of it in this month's Shutterbug "letter  
>>>> from the
>>>> editor".  It sounds very interesting and I can't wait to try it.
>>>> Is it supposed to be a c-41?
>>>>
>>>> On 1/9/08, Robert Meier <robertmeier@usjet.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone gotten ahold of any of the new T-Max 400?  B&H tells me
>>> their
>>>>> purchasing agent doesn't know anything about it!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Jeffery L. Smith
>> New Orleans, LA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Nathan Wajsman
nathan@nathanfoto.com
General photography:
http://www.nathanfoto.com
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.frozenlight.eu
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from leica68 at gmail.com (parker haeg) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)