Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Mark > > Not shure if you're right. I'm not really interested in lenstests, but > what I > can see is that those jpgs of the comparison charts shot with the more > renowned asph summicrons (right samples) have obviously been unsharp masked > (resharpened), while the summarit pictures (left samples) have obviously > not > been. I opened both in PS and zoomed into - the summicron shots have the > typical microcontrast effect which is dued to UM, not sharper glass. > > So let me interpret Puts: > > Rule 1: Leica is always better. > Rule 2: The more expensive Leica lenses are always better than the less > expensive Leica lenses. > Rule 3: If rule 1 or 2 can not be applied, use Photoshop. > > :-) Didier Well Erwin of course would not do that. Even if he had a reason to and I can't see what that reason would be. Though I can see how you can see it looks like that by just looking at it. Mark William Rabiner markrabiner.com