Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Old Leica lenses
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll)
Date: Sat Jan 12 07:19:51 2008
References: <F77845A0-B132-4DAF-997E-D5A2550CDBA4@COMCAST.NET>

Hi Len,

Really interesting!, I guess that you can have this improved result probably
only with photoshop facilities, maybe with the tradittional films you
absolute required your ASPH lens

Saludos cordiales
Luis
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de
Leonard Taupier
Enviado el: martes, 08 de enero de 2008 20:08
Para: Leica Users Group
Asunto: [Leica] Old Leica lenses

Ever since I purchased my M8 I've been experimenting with it and my older
LTM Leica lenses. This not only gives me an idea on what my film photos
taken with the Leica III series bodies will look like but it allows me to
compare performance to the modern lenses. I find the older Summars, Xenons
and Summarits are very low contrast, flare easily and definitely need a lens
hood at all times.  However that does not mean they are low resolution
lenses. The next 5 photos will demonstrate what to expect from a 50mm
Summarit directly from the camera and then 3 easy post processing steps
ending up with the comparison of the final photo compared to a 50mm Summilux
Asph.

First I would like to mention that none of the photos have sharpening
applied during the process.

The first photo is taken directly from the camera and has not been altered
except to convert it from a raw file to a jpeg. All the Summarit photos are
from the same M8 digital photo. It has low contrast even at f4.

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/LeonardT/Summarit/L1008908.jpg.html>

The 2nd photo is the same as the first except the saturation was reduced to
zero in the raw converter.

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/LeonardT/Summarit/
L1008908_BW.jpg.html>

The third is the original except Auto Levels was used on the image.  
Things are looking better.

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/LeonardT/Summarit/L1008908a.jpg.html>

The fourth photo is the same as the third except contrast was increased +20
and green was increased +20 in Color balance.

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/LeonardT/Summarit/
L1008908a_Color_Contrast.jpg.html>

or

http://tinyurl.com/373sce

The final picture is a comparison shot to a 50mm Summilux, unaltered.

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/LeonardT/Summarit/
L1008910_SummiluxAsph.jpg.html>

or

http://tinyurl.com/37tctj

The Summarit lens cost me $275  1 1/2 years ago. The Summilux cost me $2350
two years ago.

Regards,
Len











_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Old Leica lenses)
In reply to: Message from LEN-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Old Leica lenses)