Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Value of Rolleiflex
From: raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Sun Jan 13 00:51:12 2008
References: <200801121534.m0CFWkUs065898@server1.waverley.reid.org> <1200205336.4789ae1832e26@panthermail.uwm.edu>

3.5Es were made with Planars and Xenotars and with or without meters. I had 
one with Planar and meter.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <amr3@uwm.edu>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Value of Rolleiflex


> Quoting  "Allen Graves" <allen.graves@charter.net>
>
>> This showed up on the Rollei list a few weeks ago. for what it is worth.
>>
>> <http://members.aol.com/dcolucci/rolleitlr.htm>
> ....................................................................................................................................
> I looked in this list, and I can't quite find the Rollei I have.  The 
> serial
> number puts it in the
> Rolleiflex 3.5E Type 2 category (without meter, non-removable hood), but 
> it has
> a Planar 3.5 lens.  Anyone know what's up?  Also, does the Rollei list 
> have a
> digest option?
>
> Alan
>
> Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
> University Information Technology Services
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> Office Phone: 414 229-6525 | E-mail: amr3@uwm.edu
> Department Phone: 414 229-4282
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
>



In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (amr3@uwm.edu) ([Leica] OT: Value of Rolleiflex)