Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim, >>I have a close-to-mint 2.8F 12/24 for which I paid far more than $600 in the summer of 2000. Mint or not, I use it several times a year.<< That's certainly a nice camera. I'd like to find another Rolleiflex. The shutter in my 2.8C Xenotar is questionable and I'm not sure it's worth repairing. I had my 3.5E Planar CLA'd a few years ago. My only regret is that I didn't have a (Maxwell?) bright screen installed at the time. Just after I got the E back I came across a used 2.8F Planar priced at approx what you paid. It had a bright screen. I already had two Rolleis so I passed. Now I wish that I'd bought it. The bright screen makes a big difference. The only bad thing about buying an older TLR -- or any older camera for that matter -- is the potential for repair. The CLA on my E wasn't inexpensive. It probably cost about what the camera is worth. DaveR