Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Walt, > >>> I saw a lot of wide-angle obsessive compulsives in the 70's.<< > > Count me in to that group. And I never grew out of it. I hate digital > because the crop factor feels like it's constricting my field of view. I > know I haven't lost anything because my new 14mm is just like my old 21. > But I'd prefer it if the 14 really was a 14. I mean, if you go from a > car that gets 20 MPG to a car that gets 30 MPG, but the price of gas > increases 50 percent, what have you really gained. You feel good that > you use less fossil fuel, but you feel bad because your car is smaller > and probably lacks power. I want my car to get at least 30 MPG and still > have power and I want gas to be at the old price. Is that too much to > ask? :-) > > DaveR > > About the most popular lens with Canon users is their 10-22mm and Nikon the 12-24. http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1224.htm http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/Canon-10-22mm-test.shtml I just shot a critical "feature" last week and it never came off the camera. Saved my but which needed to be extracted out of a very small sports car with a shoe horn. It translates to a 18-35 with the crop factor, When I got into Leica M I got a 21mm 12/29/2001 the widest lens I shot with before that was a 24 2.8 Nikkor. Shooting with the crop factor Digital opened up my horizons like never before. And I'm not enjoying it less. f 12mm and be there! OK 18. I now feel like I need something wider than the 21 for when I shoot film with the Leica M. It will be the 12mm from Cosina with the Voigtl?nder brand name on it. http://www.nikonusa.com/fileuploads/pdfs/awards_pdfs/12-24_awards.pdf Mark William Rabiner markrabiner.com