Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG : #015
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Tue Jan 15 07:44:27 2008
References: <003b01c85747$99661dc0$41bc4054@GeeBee> <478D13EA.1050805@suddenlink.net> <8566C660-85AC-4778-8046-BCBCF46DD9D9@mindspring.com>
 
Ric
Sometimes the difference is marginal though
http://tinyurl.com/24j2ua

I think Jack meant they look less hazy, and not dark
but you're right for sure too.

phx



Ric Carter wrote:

> Fog has nothing to do with it--its any reflection. Light is lost 
> every  time it is reflected or passes through a substance. The more 
> imperfect  the reflector, the more is lost (absorption, scatter...).
>
> Ric
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Jack Maddox wrote:
>
>>  It has always struck me as odd that trees shrouded in fog appear  
>> darker in there reflections.I can't quite figure out why this happens
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from geebee at geebeephoto.com (geebee) ([Leica] IMG : #015)
Message from jmaddox01 at suddenlink.net (Jack Maddox) ([Leica] IMG : #015)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG : #015)