Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 sighting
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov)
Date: Tue Jan 22 13:37:28 2008
References: <19B72D38-07F4-49F1-AE01-459DCBD38508@charter.net> <47961415.20009@waltjohnson.com> <BF57158F-13FD-491F-8CD6-23241AAEFFB6@mac.com> <47962C5F.9070207@waltjohnson.com> <5F937C58-2C9D-4837-8F52-BF021DDDB8E7@mac.com>
It just means that Fuji is having the last laugh.
s.d.
On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Lottermoser George wrote:
1 Hasselblad H3DII-39 39 = 7 M8's = 20 Oly E-3's = 19 Nikon D300's
what does this mean?
;~ )
On Jan 22, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Walt Johnson wrote:
> Yes, but with a Nikon our pics were better.
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to:
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] M8 sighting)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] M8 sighting)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] M8 sighting)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] M8 sighting)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] M8 sighting)