Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Leica Plans
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Thu Jan 24 07:38:20 2008
References: <000901c85e44$dcec9b60$6701a8c0@xyw> <008601c85e48$c3783370$4a689a50$@net> <1DDD40EE-82ED-498D-9782-3B267A798A20@nathanfoto.com> <BAY140-W4DA49FBEAF912D7DE7E4BC7380@phx.gbl>
D-CL = M8 sensor
M9 = full frame?
phx
Javier Perez wrote:
>I was wondering for some time about a CL sized M.
>It's been possible for awhile. But I don't see how they would be able to
>justify a full sized M after that.
>Javier
>_________________________________________________________________
>Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser!
>http://biggestloser.msn.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
Replies:
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica Plans)
In reply to:
Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] Leica Plans)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica Plans)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Leica Plans)
Message from summarex at hotmail.com (Javier Perez) ([Leica] Leica Plans)