Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yep about the only thing you got ever so slightly wrong is the CCD...it seems like CMOS is what made the quality go way up and price go down. Damn who wudda thunk it...Kyle on the cutting edge. ;) The Leica Slacker rules! :) Kyle Cassidy wrote: > if the folks at Solms had been reading my BLOG back in the year Two > Thousand they would have known better! > > from my year end "PAW" essay: > > "I learned, and here I can be bold for no one seems to agree with me and > I'm usually catching up on trends about four years after they're no > longer trendy, for all intents and purposes film is dead. Within the > next five years, everything will be digital. Nobody wants to wait hours > or days for their photos when they can see them instantly. All that > remains before the funeral is ready is a higher resolution CCD chip and > a moderately priced pro-level camera. Flame away." > > > http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/pix/paw/learned-2000/2.html > > > I hope they're reading my blog now! -- Harrison McClary Harrison McClary Photography harrison@mcclary.net http://www.mcclary.net ImageStockSouth - Stock Photography http://www.imagestocksouth.com Tobacco Road: Personal Blog: http://www.mcclary.net/blog