Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted, I try to follow always your interesting opinions, but unfortunately I'm on a too busy business period that requires a big part of my time. I agree with the sense of your question, I think that modedrn technolgies will change the future opinion of a good photography, probably for the new generations, my actual pictures will be seen as we see the Atget pictures. I suppose you understand the sense of waht I want to say Saludos cordiales Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de Ted Grant Enviado el: jueves, 31 de enero de 2008 0:01 Para: 'Leica Users Group' Asunto: RE: [Leica] Leica Announcement (?) - No M9 this year; M8 Upgrade Not sure who wrote this but here's my response. > JOOC, how often do people use 1/4000? I can't remember the last time I went above 1/500. More often it's 1/4 sec or even 4 sec (with tripod of > course).<<< I find this interesting and wondered why the photographer who posted didn't use higher shutter speeds? But when shooting with a Leica I've pretty well always tried to use the "Highest possible shutter speed and widest aperture for the best exposure possible." Why if a camera is equipped as Leica's are, Ok older models, a 1/1000 of a second, why wouldn't one use the highest shutter speed to assist in cutting down the possibilities of camera shake? Unless of course the subject you're shooting requires a "blur effect" for the content. Similarly with widest aperture? Why not use the widest opening possible to assist in getting rid of or softening unwanted debris in the background. That is unless one requires a great depth of field,. IE: everything sharp from here to the moon. Any answers out there folks? ted _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information