Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gary Rules...Breath...Relax...Aim...Slack...Squeeze...Oops, that's from my shooting days. It does works well with cameras as well as M-14s. though. I certainly agree , slow can be very iffy That might be one reason there are more throw aways than keepers. The E330 looks as if it is quite capable. If I ever do move into the "modern era" Olympus will be my choice. Don't guess they take M lenses? I noticed the quality of the young lady's image seem pretty good for 1600 iso. All the tri-x shot like that adds a lot of "texture" (grain) After a while I think many of us gave up on getting rid of it and just claimed to be realists. Something else, my first car was a 56 VW....30 some miles to the gallon and I still managed to run out constantly. Why didn't they put that handle somewhere we could remember it? :-) Walt Gary Todoroff wrote: > Not saying it's impossible to get the shot at slow speed, Walt, just a > lot less likely. One of the advantages of digital in low light -- you > can shoot a lot of extra shots quickly and at no extra expense, > knowing that one of them will probably be fairly sharp. The portrait I > took at 180mm (90mm Summicron-R) equivalent at: > http://www.northcoastphotos.com/Lympa_2006_03_14.htm > was the only one out of seven or eight that came out sharp. The blurry > ones definitely would not have worked at all. > > The slow shutter speed contest sounds fun - I'll have to brush up on > my target shooting technique! Rules? > Gary Todoroff > >