Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Reductionism isn't legit OT
From: rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw)
Date: Sat Feb 2 11:48:31 2008
References: <C3C94C60.88813%mark@rabinergroup.com> <B6293C08-727B-4274-9F5D-DC466507EA35@mac.com>

What Ted said.

Bob



On Feb 2, 2008, at 8:15, Lottermoser George wrote:

I reckon you'll want to look into removable backs and/or sheet film - 
both of which did give us great choice options on a per frame basis ;~)

On Feb 1, 2008, at 9:23 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> If the next roll of  Tri X I get is incrementally coated so at the 
> beginning
> its ASA 50 and at the end of the roll its ASA 3200 and you can get 
> cameras
> with little micro motors and memories so you can dial in what ASA or 
> ISO you
> want to for each shot and the film goes shooting to that area that 
> would
> sure get me excited about running out and getting a roll of Tri x!!!!!

Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07




_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Reductionism isn't legit OT)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Reductionism isn't legit OT)