Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The TE and WATE are probably really zooms, except that they are corrected only at the 3 FL. And the cams etc that move the elements may not be linear ( or whatever) for In between FL. As well, there probably are not the relative coordination of the different elements. But why worry, take a R lens and give it a M bayonet and you are off to the races....... This stuff is not brain surgery... ( with apologies to the brain surgeons that may be on this list...) While I do own a TE, the use of the lens in between FL stops is out of my curiosity space...... I think a Zooming M would be a market winner, but I think it is not something I would have any interest in. I prefer to concentrate on my shots rather than spin another ring....The M ( since 1953) has done that brilliantly. Frank Filippone red735i@earthlink.net Is the Tri-Elmar anything other than a 28-50mm zoom lens with detents at 28, 35, and 50? The lens diagram seems to indicate that only a single element moves during the focal-length change, so unless there's something about the design that screws up the focus at intermediate positions, it seems to me that it should have a continuous range of FLs. Has anyone tried taking photos with the FL ring in intermediate positions? What was the result?