Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 6:07 PM +0000 2/3/08, Steve Unsworth wrote: >Well I've shot the frames on Kodachrome, all I need to do now is wait a >month until they're processed and sent back to me. > >Only kidding I used the Tri-Elmar on an M8. The intermediate positions >didn't give sharp images. > >I seem to remember Puts describing the lens as a zoom, but as mentioned >earlier perhaps the relevant element(s) only 'click' together at the >standard focal lengths. > >Steve > > >On 3/2/08 17:25, "Howard Ritter" <hlritter@bex.net> wrote: > >> Nevertheless. >> >> There must be someone on the list who owns an M8/TE and who has a more >> comprehensive or elastic curiosity space. Or whimsical :-). >> >> How about shooting a few frames with the FL ring set in various >> intermediate positions, looking at some tight crops from center and >> edges, and telling us whether the lens seems to be a true zoom? Or >> from someone with the requisite technical familiarity: is it a zoom? > It's even easy to tell the TE can't be a zoom because the order of focal lengths is: 28-50-35. Can't have a zoom with that arrangement. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com