Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] re: does process matter
From: jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Mon Feb 11 10:12:22 2008
References: <0JW3003JF66BRG60@l-daemon>

Ted,

Yes, we did all those things in the darkroom, but it has been so many years 
ago that the details get lost in the vagueness of my memory.  Did you ever 
use one of those multi-leaf vignetting stands that were made of wood and red 
plastic?  That was the beginning of PS.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] re: does process matter


> George Lottermoser offered:
>
> *       I make variations with the computer and ink jet printer all the
> time.<<<<
>
>
>
> To which Ric Carter said:
>
>>>Me, too, and not always on purpose;^)<<<<
>
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Didn't we do this kind of thing when working with an enlarger, paper and 
> wet
> trays?
>
> Wasn't it considered part of the creative process? Like burning in, 
> dodging,
> paper contrast change and paper surface and weight.
>
> Or am I off track about this topic question?
>
> ted
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] re: does process matter)
In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] re: does process matter)