Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Come to think of it, so were mine: Brownie Starflash: <http://www.brownie-camera.com/36.shtml> Mine was blue Didn't get another camera until I was in college: Yashica-Mat 124 <http://tinyurl.com/ywyxv6> It was thrown down (literally) by a wedding phototg who had it jam one time too many. A girl who lived in the other half of my duplex brought it home curious to tear it apart. We did, and when I put it back together, it worked. I bought film, talked to a friend who brewed his own, bought developer and tank and dove in. I tell folks I'm a graduate of the label and insert school of photography;^) You may be right about fitting lens coverage being the reason we had square format. Didn't the first box Kodaks deliver round pictures on square prints? Maybe the question should have been, "When and why did we stop worrying about square?" Related to the proscenium perhaps? Ric Carter http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/ On Feb 28, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > My first two cameras shot squares. > > The first one 1958 when I was 10-12 yrs old: (1960-2) Brownie Starlet > http://www.geh.org/fm/brownie/htmlsrc/mE13000055_ful.html#topofimage > http://www.vieilalbum.com/BrownieStarletFR.htm > Manufactured : 1957-62 Lens : Dakon Shutter : Rotary Quantity Made : > Original List Price : $6 Film Size : 127 Negative Size : 4x4 cm > Made in France!!!!!!!! > > > Then in Chicago a holiday season came along and: > 1963 13-14 yrs old: Instamatic 100 126 Cartridge 28x28mm > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kodak_Instamatic_100.jpg