Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Thu Feb 28 07:15:54 2008
References: <541F0D48-41FF-4D3B-80FA-755AE07D2045@mac.com> <018701c87991$4c6586c0$0302a8c0@MacPhisto> <BF05D858-57F5-41B1-87FB-3CC1CD2E2D31@mac.com> <002201c879aa$650de5f0$6401a8c0@asus930>
 
which is why I said - keep the M8+ as the flagship product, perfect  
it, get rid of every bug and make it the M3 of digital.

Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07



On Feb 27, 2008, at 7:36 PM, G Hopkinson wrote:

> George in my opinion these may well be practical concepts, however  
> the very 'M'ness would be destroyed in the process. You might end
> up with a new camera which is simpler or more familiar to operate,  
> but loss of that unique RF manual focus arrangement might
> severely damage the connection to the perceived quality and  
> tradition of the M's.
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be)