Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] re: Erwin telling it
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov)
Date: Thu Feb 28 08:19:44 2008
References: <0JWY0032MH4EBP00@l-daemon>

I usually print my leica negs no bigger than 6x8. It's just before  
the grain starts breaking up. That way the tonality stays consistent  
with my 120 and 4x5 images.
s.d.

On Feb 28, 2008, at 7:45 AM, Ted Grant wrote:

>
>
> Douglas Nygren offered:
> Subject: Erwin telling it
>
>>> I totally agree with Mark about Leica glass quality.
>
>
>
> I used my Leica again and was astounded at the quality I was  
> getting. I
> still shoot MF, but I use my M6 a lot more and routinely make 16x20  
> prints
> from its negatives--<<<
>
> I?m always amazed when I read that someone is surprised by the  
> quality of
> Leica glass and making 16X20 prints or larger.
>
> I?ve done that for years for exhibitions, home and office d?cor. So  
> quite
> frankly if one is truly into believing in LEICA  glass this should  
> never be
> a surprise!
>
> ted
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] re: Erwin telling it)
In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] re: Erwin telling it)