Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Mar 3 10:08:20 2008
References: <20080302223928.63377D7B@resin15.mta.everyone.net> <290D28E6-3A1C-4862-A13D-C4A8200DE35C@bigpond.net.au> <3cad89990803030211q3b1d96e9n2cd7c3973a7d2b91@mail.gmail.com> <BB95CA64-2518-4B81-98F3-AEB002A29EAC@cox.net>
as others have mentioned over the years: exposure matters a great
deal with digital (more like transparency) and certainly matters
whether you shoot RAW or not.
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Mar 3, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:
> is that an absolute fact though ?
Replies:
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
In reply to:
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin@afirkin.com) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)