Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait...now RAW
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com)
Date: Tue Mar 4 09:12:37 2008

Ted,

This is a great Idea.  If later this year maybe in Europe?  I say this as I 
will be in Europe from August through November.  ;-)  But before then great 
here in the US or maybe in Canada, but I realise we have many members 
outside of the US.

Gene

-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
>
> George and others lay out technical information explaining improvement
> possibilities and my thoughts are always .. "gee it's too bad we as a group
> can't put together a yearly LUG gathering where we can learn, try and
> observe the technical aspects described in the posts?
> 
> And best of all meet and hand shake the names on the screen. But it's
> technical stuff one on one that would be the greatest benefit to all!
> 
> I'm not sure how this can be done but someone who has the experience might
> have a thought about it for later in the year or a solid gathering for 
> 2009.
> What think you lads and lasses?
> 
> ted
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
> Lottermoser George
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:37 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait...now RAW
> 
>  
> 
> I look at exposure alterations in post processing more as if making a  
> 
> light or darker print then having any effect on the virtual negative.  
> 
> As far as the virtual RAW negative is concerned - if the highlights  
> 
> are blown they're blown there's no retrieving them in post  
> 
> processing. And on the other end - when you've reached the threshold  
> 
> of introducing noise into the shadows - whatever post process fixes  
> 
> you may apply - the shadow will remain messy.
> 
>  
> 
> Similarly, what ever you can do to achieve proper WB in your lighting  
> 
> will make life easier in post. If you've got cross-over happening -  
> 
> you've got color problems - even though the post process software  
> 
> allows you to tweak to your heart's content.
> 
>  
> 
> Digital is super wonderful for what one can fix in post processing.  
> 
> RAW is amazing compared to other capture formats. But using the best  
> 
> craftsmanship before pushing the button still gives the finest end -  
> 
> just as with film.
> 
>  
> 
> Fond regards,
> 
> George
> 
> george@imagist.com
> 
> www.imagist.com
> 
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> 
> Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On Mar 3, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> > Guys, the reasons to shoot RAW are well known. I guess that  
> 
> > Jayanand is saying that you haven't permanently changed your  
> 
> > exposure decision. That is you can vary the exposure in the  
> 
> > conversion.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Leica Users Group.
> 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> 
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> 
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.3/1308 - Release Date: 3/3/2008
> 10:01 AM
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information