Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote: > >> I spent a fortune on a 21 and 24 ASPH Elmarit M's 7 and 8 years ago and > got >> great results with them on film. >> >> Unlike Canon glass I'd bet they'd give me excellent performance right out > to >> the edges on a Leica approved sensor just like they do with film. > > The trick is finding that Leica-approved sensor. At the moment the M8 is > the best available for your ASPH lenses. The angle of incidence of the RF > camera bites M wides much more than it does the Canon wides on an SLR. > >> They are no holds barred optics which deserve better than this: >> >> 21 * 1.33 = 27.93 >> 24 * 1.33 = 31.92 > > Agreed... likewise my APO lenses (100 and 280) deserve a full-frame sensor. > OTOH the pictures I get using the 280 on a cropped sensor are better than > the ones I wouldn't get if I were to put the lens on a shelf until a 24mm x > 36mm Leica-approved sensor comes on the market. The choice as I see it: > collect dust or make cropped pictures. My lenses deserve better than to > collect dust (they also deserve a 16-bit sensor like the DMR's). > > Doug Herr > Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > Cropped sensors can work both ways ultra photo guys love them. I love how a compact lightweight normal because a fast short tele. I'm sure with both Nikon and Canon shooters having a full frame for higher quality option Leica is not going to be putting to much further R&D into cropped formats. Leica is after all in the higher quality business. It didn't want to do a cropped sensor at the start, But ff seems to be much more possible now. Digital cameras are a top consumer item and there is much R&D going on every year - a year is a decade in digital development research. Mark William Rabiner markrabiner.com