Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I was all set to buy an M8 after the announcement that it would be upgradeable in the future. With the recent change of heart (and management), I am going to wait and see. I am just a casual shooter with most years resulting in around thirty + rolls. I can justify my present Leicas (M6TTL, IIIG and a IIIF) with the fact that they last so long. A digital M is not only twice (or more) as expensive, it is also set to not be repairable in as little as five years. Heavy shooters and pros can easily justify the expense with the huge film and processing savings but I am not shooting enough to do the same. Yes I know it would free up my shooting, a fortune saved in processing, etc, etc and I agree with all those arguments. However, a digital camera also entails more frequent computer equipment upgrades as well. All this to say that I could justify the expense if I could be assured of a camera that would last, albeit with regular injections of cash. Even if I didn't do every upgrade, the fact that it is upgradeable means it also stays repairable. I could wait to until there were problems before upgrading. Will I eventually go digital? It sure looks like I will have to when chrome starts to dry up but, as things stand right now, I will wait until then. John