Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] More management blabla
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Mar 10 10:56:42 2008
References: <cee56220803100326h75b5484ctdd91a621995df0cb@mail.gmail.com> <20080310111411.97B02584670@smtp1.nine.ch> <004701c882a4$efe09760$6401a8c0@xyw> <cee56220803100511s6d727b74ic95e11d1b63a8814@mail.gmail.com> <9b678e0803100748k604f9f75qfb6eda3bb0d1aa1c@mail.gmail.com>
You must have missed Mark's and my format "real estate" discussion ;~)
Bottom line: quality comes from surface area and bit depth even more
than m-pixel
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Don Dory wrote:
> It
> makes no sense to have an oversize sensor when you can get over
> 22MP out of
> 24x36 and ISO's over 3200 that look very good by any standard.
In reply to:
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema@wanadoo.nl) ([Leica] More management blabla)
Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] More management blabla)
Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] More management blabla)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema@wanadoo.nl) ([Leica] More management blabla)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] More management blabla)