Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George, >>While processing film, with intensive study of the relationship of exposure to development as they relate to tonal control; and the fine art of printing with silver paper and chemicals are wonderful crafts; they have little to do with what a Photographer chooses to photograph, how they see or use light, compose the frame, etc.<< I disagree. Photographing with film, particularly with the intent of making a chemical print, has everything to do with how I see light, compose, frame, etc. Sometimes I even think that shooting BW film is a different mentally from digital photography as still photography is from motion picture photography. I'm not sure about others, but when I shoot digital I rarely think in terms of BW. It may end up that an image works out better in BW. But it's usually serendipitous rather than planned. OTOH when I'm shooting BW film everything is aimed at making a BW print. Since color is not even an option I ignore it beyond how it will come across on BW film, given the spectral sensitivity or use of filters. OTOH, I'm way more cognizant of shapes, forms, textures, etc. Lighting and composition are very closely linked to those things. While they can be important in color, they usually take a back seat to color hue and saturation. Yet they everything when it comes to BW film. One example regarding light; I commonly use flash with color (digital) and don't have any issues with it. But it is extremely rare that I ever used flash when shooting BW film. I think we overestimate the similarity of BW film and digital (color) photography. I have a great appreciation for film, and I'm a little bummed that I'm slowly losing what little knowledge about it I gained over the years. It's one of those things that if you don't use it you lose it. DaveR