Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I have been going through a similar selection process, and came down > on the Mac Pro side. A single quad processor configuration is priced > in the same ballpark as the 2.8 GHz 24" iMac, has double the processor > power and has much greater expandability. I already have two monitors > so I wont need to buy another one and I don't like the idea of a > bundled monitor with the Imac. > I am holding back on the purchase because all the Mac rumor sites > (such as http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/ ) feel that a new iMac is > coming within the next few weeks and I think that is plausible. I want > to see what it looks like before a final decision. > My current Mac is an Intel Macbook (not Pro). I bought it a year ago > as a trial to replace a 2.8GHz Windows XP and it turned out so much > faster than my old system that I have not yet gotten a desktop. Imac's are for students sitting in Starbucks. And big babies. No clue really. Mark William Rabiner markrabiner.com