Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Somewhat OT Canon lens question
From: jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Thu Mar 20 20:08:07 2008
References: <20080321030117.TKBH11989.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net>

Ken,

What about the extra load on the camera lugs, assuming that the strap is 
attached to lugs?  Were they designed to carry that much weight?  I have a 
Leica IIIa on which one of the lugs will rotate in the body, and I don't 
trust it to hold the camera.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Carney" <kcarney1@cox.net>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:01 PM
Subject: [Leica] Somewhat OT Canon lens question


>I have been carrying around a Canon dslr on a shoulder strap (Upstrap), 
>with
> the 70-200 2.8L IS attached.  It has a tripod collar, which I seldom use,
> but it got me to thinking.  I wonder if there is any undue stress on the
> lens mount by carrying the camera on a strap without lens support?  I 
> can't
> seem to find anything on the internet, but would bet the ranch that 
> someone
> here would know.  Thx
>
> Ken
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Somewhat OT Canon lens question)
In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Somewhat OT Canon lens question)