Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Phil, I totally get that the ability to make things look other than they are exists - and with great ease in the digital world. And I don't with to sound accusatory to those who use them. Just interested in the trends as well as the whys and why-nots as we each see them. Surely nobody's asking for my approval (or even my opinion - which I offer freely) ;~) Fond regards, George george@imagist.com www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07 On Mar 21, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Phil Swango wrote: > The gallery owner is a Polaroid nut and wanted to do something that > suggested a retro theme. As it ended up we didn't use it but that > was the > idea. It was originally to be used for a postcard invitation to an > opening. In the end they went for something else. My point is > that there > are times when a special effect is required for an image you > already have. > I don't see why that's so hard to accept. Happens all the time. > How about > all those edge effect plug-ins for film sprocket holes, etc.? > Polaroid > transfer clones. > > I'm not asking you to approve of it! ;-)