Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Well, when I turned 35, needed glasses, I thought it was all over with > MF..... so I dumped all me Canon stuff for Nikon AF. In this case, an > 8008s > > Then I noted that I could focus the lenses better than the camera > could..... > and faster..... so I did not use AF very much..... > > Now I use my F4 and all MF lenses, and my Leica M^ and my newly acquired > old > technology Nikon D1, and I can still focus better than any AF lens + Nikon > I > own..... > > I like MF lenses..... and as long as I can focus them, I will continue to > use them. > > Of course, if I was doing pro work, and PJ especially, I would own AF > only... But I am not. And buying into all the AF stuff now would break > the > bank..... > > Ahhhh, the glory of being an amateur...... 4x5, Hasselblad, and Leica..... > all MF. > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net > > > And they do tend to focus better then I do. > > > Mark William Rabiner > > > I had done a bunch of low light shooting with MF and missed my focus a whole bunch if times a month ago and before that. If it was an AFS lens set at AF I know I'd not have missed more than one of them. It just nails it. Part of it is the viewfinder knows you're going to probably use AF so its not a big groundglass thing like the old cameras. So I'm not all that down on AF. I just like MF so I can more quickly focus on the part of the image I want in focus and not reposition or move a sensor around. Mark William Rabiner markrabiner.com