Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I think you guys are pi**ing against the wind. I too have found the > Kyocera/Zeiss lenses to be exceptionally good, especially for the > going price. But I think we are in an argument here where anything > that wasn't built in German by Leica is considered to be garbage, and > anyone who likes anything other than Leica is a moron. I wish I were > affluent enough to scoff anything other than Leica, but there are just > too many outstanding images out there produced by lenses other than > Leica to deduce that anything non-Leica is garbage. > NO I'm talking about using you eyeballs and looking at a obviously shoddily made product. With an awful ribbed cheap metal focusing collar. Cheap looking painted on numbers. And priced higher than gorgeous Nikon or Canon glass. Sigma made a better finished product. This glass looked like Vivitar, Tokina or Tamron. Tamron mainly. Mark William Rabiner markrabiner.com